Total Pageviews

Friday, August 22, 2008

COLIN/COLINETTE

Six days ago a young humpback calf wandered into Pittwater, a bay area just North of Sydney Harbour, and a playground for the well off.
It had clearly been separated from its mother and was lost.

Enter Australia’s finest, the NPWS (National Parks and Wildlife Service) and the catalogue of incompetence, rivalled only by fuckwit Iemma and his cronies in the NSW Labor Government, began.
We’ll fast forward to yesterday, some five days after the initial sighting of the distressed young whale. A day when they discovered he wasn’t in fact, Colin, so much as Colinette, a she.
Good work NPWS – only five days.

Back to the beginning.
Colinette, as I mentioned, drifted into Pittwater obviously lost and in distress, and began to swim up to any boats in the area that resembled the size of her mother.
The NPWS watched, and in their oh so important epiletted uniforms, discussed what to do.
One day turned into two; two into three; into four.
The young whale was starving to death while the “experts” (I have such fucking contempt for these people) sought advice from...well, fuckin everybody. Meantime, the whale starved and in its way, as a frightened child might, pleaded for help, demostrated by its constant nudging against the hulls of boats. A heart-tugging sight.
The NPWS continued to procrastinate. They set up an exclusion area to prevent those who had the wherewithal and desire to help, from coming near the terrified young whale.
At no time did they attempt to feed the hungry infant, despite having a precedent in America where they did exactly that. They watched it starve and as its health deteriorated, they wrung their collective hands and said, “there’s nothing we can do”. So not so much a “can do” attitude as “can’t do” then…
Six days later, they put the helpless animal to death.

The public were divided into two groups; one side claiming it was nature at work and people need to get over it, the other outraged at the NPWS’s apparent lack of action in helping the animal and it’s eventual destroying it.

The first group are a mixture of callous and indifference and are the sorts of people who if they own a dog for example, keep it outside. They cite examples in nature where this happens often. We know nothing about it, they argue. And they’re right –it does. Nature is very harsh at times. But on this occasion it didn’t. It occurred in full view of us and it is, (or at least, is in my world) incumbent on us as rulers of the planet to do what we can to protect those that can’t protect themselves – no matter what species. They should have towed it out to the migration lanes and waited. Sooner or later an adult would’ve appeared. They cruise up and down that coast all year round. True, they do have a “season’ as it were but also, it’s not unheard of for individuals just expelled from the group to be nomadic.
And if the worst was to eventuate and a surrogate didn't appear, well, at least they tried. Here they didn't. Didn't do a fucking thing - just let it suffer while they dawdled, the destroyed it.
They should've fed it, at least for the short term, to give it some breathing space. But no, the experts froze, completely stunned in their incompetence.

The second group have, judging by the radio calls I heard, the animal’s best interest at heart and fail to see how something can’t be done.

The geniuses with the university degrees (what, in sinking piss and rutting each other like pigs…?) towed the animal out to sea at one point and…left it. Sort of, “Ok, this’ll do”.
The whale followed them back, alone and frightened, seeking help.
The experts were stumped.
This was about incompetence and money, make no mistake. They didn’t want to spend the money they use to fund their cars and “educational” trips on just a whale.
It fine when they’re reaping it in while the whales migrate, when they charge king’s ransoms to send out their boats to whalewatch but when the time comes to step up and help one of the money making machines…
Tough shit for Colin/Colette.

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

I must disagree with you . I listened to a news item where someone filled a large container with milk and attached the closest he could get to a nipple and tried to tempt the young whale with it--to no avail.
It was also stated that the calf was abandoned by its mother.
Have I got my facts incorrect.

mutters said...

Yes and no. That the infant was alone would certainly suggest she was separated from the mother. Turns out an adult carcass washed up on a beach south of Sydney, which they assume is the mother (very convenient for the NPWS).
Regardless, it's well documented that any female will act as a surrogate to an infant (in any species but especially whales/dolphins). So they should've at least tried.
As for "attempting" to feed it, (which in point of fact, they didn't). All that was needed was a bottle such as is used with human babies - except on a much larger scale.
The issue is, Gladiola, they didn't attempt anything; just observed as it grew weaker and weaker.
Then they killed it. And pretended to give a fuck...

Anonymous said...

I DO see your point Muttars but things are not always black and white. It is the grey area that sometines tells the tale.

Have you ever been there--the grey area I mean.

mutters said...

Let me put it this way, Gladiola:

If you found ...let's say, a dog, that was distressed, you'd take it home and either find its owner, take it to the RSPCA, or care for it yourself, right? You wouldn't just watch on as it slowly died (at least I hope you wouldn't - anyone with an ounce of compassion wouldn't...).
Well. this is the same thing. True, a 10 ton whale isn't a dog, but the NPWS isn't an individual either. They have the Federal government behind them (which has a surplus of 21 billion dollars).
They make enough, as I've said, out of these creatures every year as they migrate up the east coast when they send out the boats to view them (and then claim the GST etc). The least they could do is to at least TRY to help this unfortunate one. They didn't. They simply hung around feeling self important, refusing to allow those that wanted to, to help.
This is about money and nothing else, Gladiola. They weighed up the cost against "just a whale" and that signed its death warrant.
I'm disgusted. This is a body whose name claims to be a service for wildlife.
Where's the service here???
As I mentioned in the post, they did tow it out to sea; but then just cut it loose in the middle of nowhere - and of course, like all frightened infants do - it followed them back. They should've taken it to the migratory lanes and waited for an expelled adolescent female or something similar to appear.
They should've fed the animal - at least for a while. We're talking about simply, a large nipple (don't even get me started on the "they couldn't find it" bollocks). If they are THAT incompetent, then sack them and get someone who isn't.
Bottom line: if they did this, and even if no surrogate was to be found, then at least they tried. That's all anyone asked. Instead they just watched until it grew so weak that the window was missed.
Again - I'm disgusted and I'll be sending a letter of condemnation to the NPWS (along with a link to this post).

Spoony Quine said...

!!! That's horrible! Aren't they endangered or something? I don't want these people in charge of my whales, thank you!
` Then again, it would be more cruel to put the animal in captivity, I think. The poor whale!
` The thing is, it's not a domesticated animal, so people are not necessarily responsible for it.
` I wonder why its mother died?

` Even so, I think it's almost as nutty as the fact that PETA kills 97 percent of their animals, whereas regular animal shelters only kill 20% and the rest of the animals find homes.
` Did you hear about this one PETA official who went around collecting stray dogs and cats, saying he would find homes for them, and later their bullet-ridden corpses were found dumped behind a Piggly Wiggly store!
` I saw an interview with a veterinarian who said the PETA guy told him the litter of kittens he gave away would be easiest to place. He was outraged to find that all the guy did was bring them home, take them out back and shoot them all!
` Why? Because apparently shelter life is so cruel he just had to put them down. Hello? Why not give them homes instead?
` I think what happens with PETA is that lots of those people think that having a pet is cruel, so we should just neuter all pets until they go extinct.
` Wow.

mutters said...

They were...then they were added to the protected species list (largely on account of the Slopes slaughtering them for "research" - for "research", read "eating").
And this bloody country has the loudest voice - but that's all (they're scared of the Japs, y'see...).
So it further compounds the hypocrisy of recent events.

Not a thing, man - they didn't lift a fucking finger and worse, they prevented anyone else doing so either.

Listen, See, go to their website and tell them what you think of their behaviour. Don't hold back.

Spoony Quine said...

Bastard pansies! I wonder if anyone ate the whale?

mutters said...

Yep, a country of frightened people. What's worse is the fact that they trade with Japan and want to protect the money they make from them - and damn anything that gets in the way.

A picture in the paper showed the dead whale being lifted out of the water in a sling. A tragic sight.

They should've (if it was absolutely unavoidable - and let's face it, with these morons it seemed to be...) left it out at sea and let nature dispose of it. Food for the sea creatures (sharks et al). Perfect recycling.

Wankers, man...real arseholes!